As I struggle to find the sample set (representative trauma blogs) for my dissertation, I have been able to separate the bloggers into three categories based on their rhetorical strategies for dealing with trauma. One set of trauma bloggers discuss the intimate details of their traumas, clearly focusing on the internal struggles of PTSD. The other set of bloggers seem to externalize their trauma by focusing on the political aspects of post traumatic stress disorder without revealing a large amount of personal information. There is a third set of bloggers that I situate between the other two. These bloggers have situated themselves as therapeutic experts in the sense that they provide a healing plan based on their own process of healing. Most of them are careful to note that they are not trained professionals and that their advice should not be taken in lieu of seeking professional help. Still, their strategy is an interesting one because it positions them as expert, helper, and survivor/victim. To some extent these are the most complex. They implicitly argue for the value of personal experience by positioning themselves as a form of expert. This, of course, is not unusual in the blogosphere. Bloggers typically position themselves as authorities based on their experience. This is necessary to establish an ethos with their audience. Productivity blogs are particularly focused on this, because, like trauma bloggers, they are presenting a kind of self-help regimine based on the strategies that have worked for them.
The rhetorical strategies of these bloggers raise interesting questions regarding standards of evidence. In academia, personal experience, while not entirely eschewed, is not valued as highly as other forms of research. Experience is not considered rigorous in the ways that quantitative and other forms of qualitative data are. Thus, while situating one’s research within a personal context is acceptable, using personal experience as theory or evidence is not. Rather than increasing one’s ethos, the academic who focuses on personal experience will most likely have their research regarded as spurious at best. I realize that we are talking about very different genres with distinctly different audiences and that these are not necessarily comprable. However, I’m interested in exploring this further. Given that there are many academic blogs that contain a mixture of experience and theoretical discussion, might there be an opportunity for a hybridization of scholarly genres? Could this provide inroads into increasing the valuation of experiential evidence?